326 comments

1. This is a no brainer and speaks tons about the arrogance of those who pulled it off! And remember bush, rummy, chaney, rice: all rethuglirats

   Reply

   1. Can we add a city for you? Or some other relevant piece of info?

      Reply

      1. It’s simple…..” Now You See-it….Now You Don’t ! “

         Reply

      2. Tomas Hannigan, worked in steel industry for thirty years, aluminium aircraft cannot penetrate concrete and steel girders.. Simple as that

         Reply

         1. Thanks, Tomas!

            Reply

            1. Thanks Craig, please add, Tomas Dublin, Ireland,

      3. Tomas from Dublin Ireland, worked in the steel industry for the last thirty years, Aluminium aircraft cannot penitrate concrete and steel girders, simple as that.

         Reply

   2. Power to the people

      Reply

      1. Please add my name:Richard Cate, 9/11 researcher and former instructor of research methods- Northeastern U.

         Reply

2. Please add me. David E. Bauer, Esq., Portland, Maine USA

   Reply

   1. Thanks!

      Reply

      1. Can U add me please? Steve Rowlands… Las Vegas. Nevada

         Reply

3. Jerry Alatalo: peace activist and writer, Upper Peninsula, Michigan, U.S.A.

   Reply

4. Realizing 9/11 was done by our own government changed my whole perspective on our governments true agenda, and how truly evil men can be for pure greed and control.

   Reply

   1. Just shows how much of a hold the Zionist Israeli has on the US Government.

      Reply

      1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOq-LbQ4erM

         Reply

   2. Major General Albert Stubblebine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E

      Reply

5. I never believed a plane hit the Pentagon. I don’t believe anything about 9/11 in fact.

   Reply

   1. Thanks, Deboralynn. Can we add your city to your name?

      Reply

6. Please add me: Ruth Elkin, Portland, Maine, U.S.

   Reply

7. Don Chisholm, Greenbank Ontario Canada

   Reply

   1. Sorry about the typo. In regards to my comment Willy’s last name is spelled Whitten

      Reply

8. Add me. Clayton Wages, Sacramento CA

   Reply

9. Craig, I thought I had added myself but my name is not on the list. Please add me, thanks.

   Reply

   1. I thought you had, too! But my brain is pretty fried. I’ll add you.

      Reply

      1. Pls add me. I live in Addison, IL.

         Reply

         1. Thanks, Solange!

            Reply

10. Can you please add me too: Felicity Van Dyke, Mount Beauty VIC, Australia.

    Reply

11. Feeling much gratitude to be included on this list of “Wide Awake” #Truthers; the PNAC’s #VitalLie #GreatDeception (ref. #DavidHooper) #FalseFlag attack be damned!

    Reply

    1. Thanks for signing on, Lew!

       Reply

12. My hat is off to Craig, Barrie and Kelly for taking on the daunting task of creating this list. It demonstrates that there is in fact enormous agreement among truthers that a 757 did not hit. Those claiming that a large passenger plane DID hit are few in number but make a lot of noise, giving the impression that there are more of them than there really are.
    It reminds me of the advice about what to do if you encounter a mountain lion in the wild: wave your arms over you head and speak in a loud voice, so the lion thinks you are a formidable foe. The group pushing the impact scenario has taken that advice to heart and has been waving their arms madly and shouting, in an attempt to convince the rest of us that they represent a sizable bloc of the total truther population, and that we should throw some of our strongest evidence under the bus in solidarity with their highly unpopular opinion.

    Reply

    1. Couldn’t agree more Sheila. Kudos to Craig and the others who’ve helped get this initiative rolling.

       Reply

    2. I’d have to respectfully disagree with that assessment. A list of 500 plus people is hardly a consensus of the 9/11 Truth Movement. I have 700 members in my 9/11 Truth meetup group alone. A true consensus of the 500 plus is determining whether or not they’ve all seen and have been exposed to the exact same information both for and against and then determine from there where people are at. But then why would anyone really care since consensus is not science anyway. At one time a large majority believed the earth was flat it doesn’t make it true.

       Reply

13. Please add me,no wings, no engines, no tail, no seats, bones, teeth? . .
    Vance Hirst Jr Capron, IL

    Reply

14. I, Kelly Marie Richard: Aurora, Ontario, Canada, do not believe a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Please add my name to the list.

    Reply

15. Substantial evidence exposing who had the extraordinary means, motive, and opportunity to orchestrate 9/11…
    https://www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7662

    Reply

    1. Yes, Kelly Marie Richard, very compelling list you’ve got here. Great job, I’ve noticed many of these things also and find it unbelievable how things are so tied up neatly to seemingly crucify us all in the end. It helps explain a lot of the carnage happening around the world with wars, coups and false flags to distract people from critical thinking and looking at the bigger picture. I myself can find no other explanation for all this subterfuge and secrecy. Although I do see the ends are fraying somewhat as one can never keep all the details hidden all the time from everyone and many people see these connections too, one can hope. Thanks, I do wish more people realized how crucial it is to be unified in creating some way to prevent this diabolical takeover which is very well seeded by now.

       Reply

       1. Please add me

          Stacey Biddick
          New Zealand

          Reply

          1. Thanks, Stacey!

             Reply

       2. Commercial and military pilots agree. Air traffic controllers agree. Our government’s story of what happened here is simply impossible.

          Reply

16. Please add my name: Vic d’Obrenan Calgary, Canada

    Reply

17. Why continue to haggle over the ‘how’, while the real perpetrators continue to harvest from the big lies?
    I’m #260 above on the list and maker of http://911JusticeCampaign.org
    The most strategic effort is to expose who did 9-11. Support Bollyn.com

    Reply

    1. And exactly who are the real perpetrators and why?

       Reply

       1. Read my references, Ed Brotherton. Everyone take note of Brotherton’s role here.

          Reply

          1. Apparently Brotherton didn’t visit http://911JusticeCampaign.org to see the list of key suspects–yet he feels at liberty to draw conclusions about my positions.

             Reply

          2. What’s your best determination, Brotherton, as to a key suspects list? You must have posted something about this as “you guys have a tremendous amount of work to do”. So save some of us the work you know is needed and post a link to your own research into WHO DID 9-11, please.

             Reply

          3. smh, not him again

             Reply

          4. Many of have taken note.

             Reply

          5. Brotherton strikes me as one of those disinformation agents who pretend to be 9/11 truthers but serve only to sow discord and divide us.

             Reply

       2. Ed Brotherton is a troll from the 911 Truth Movement site.

          Reply

18. The turmix effect makes it understandable that an airplane can not fly at ground level.
      (When I make mayonnaise, the turbulence of the blades drags the bottom of the jar.)

    Reply

19. Please add me: Michael David Morrissey: Kassel, Germany. Author of The Transparent Conspiracy.

    Reply

    1. Thanks, Michael!

       Reply

20. Please add me too. Thought I was on the list already. Johan Verdensfred, Designer, teacher, peace activist, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Reply

21. Well done Craig, Kelly, and Barrie!!!

    Reply

22. Captain Dan Hanley – Islamabad, Pakistan

    Reply

23. Please add my name: Jan van Aken, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Reply

24. Please add my name to the list.
    Roger Domagalski, Warsaw Poland
    Feel free to check out my comments on this issue on my Facebook page over the years.

    Reply

25. Every year I take another look at the Pentagon 9/11 issue. While I still do not know exactly what happened there, I can say I am 100% convinced that no 757 hit the pentagon. So you can add me to this list.
    Earl Erickson, Montana, USA

    Reply

26. Shameful that our government exterminated four plane loads of people and the thousands in the towers to advance their agenda to take our liberties and to make their cohorts (KBR, Haliburton and Black Water) rich….

    Reply

27. Add me up Scotty!

    Reply

    1. Can we add your city and country?

       Reply

28. If a debased DOD at large can fudge the books billing for an extra 40K nonexistent troops, what’s so hard for a few real monsters in the DOD fudging the books over some nonexistent plane parts???
    Add my name please, Erin S. Myers

    Reply

    1. Can we add your city and country?

       Reply

    2. please add my name to your list

       Reply

29. Please add my name to the list.
    Marc Ruff, Phoenix Arizona

    Reply

30. Official Story, please convince me which you’re certainly not doing since day one!

    Reply

31. Hey Craig. Would there be any chance of Willy Witten adding his name to the list by his request?

    Reply

    1. Yes, sure. Could he add his city?

       Reply

       1. Princeton, Indiana

          Reply

          1. Thanks, David! Will add you now.

             Reply

             1. Tried to reply to this but my comment did not show up.

             2. Tried to reply where? To which comment? I saw this one. And the previous one.

             3. The comment that got eaten was along the lines of:
                Oh… The “Princeton, Indiana” was for Whitten’s city and state, not for myself. I don’t think I’m worthy of this list…
                And, while we are on the subject, I’d like to express how unfortunate I find that Willy is no longer here at T&S.

             4. I wondered if you meant Willy. If you are telling me he wants on the list, I’ll add him. I already have your name on there, so why not give me a town and off we go?
                I think it’s regrettable what happened with Willy, too, but he trashed me and this blog so insanely that it’s not fixable.

             5. Oh my… Because of this list of yours, now I’m gonna be so embarrassed when they release the 6th frame in 2061.
                But, ok… Brooklyn, New York please

             6. Yes, David, perhaps it’s best that we take no position at all to avoid the 2061 humiliation.

32. Less we forget as a nation ….

    Reply

33. I read that survivors smelled explosives and not jet fuel. Cruise missile exploded just prior to hitting the building, Navy accounting office destroyed that had discovered trillions of dollars missing in black ops budget. The official story stinks and full of holes if you read enough.

    Reply

    1. There is no evidence that a cruise missile exploding before the building. This is the point of sticking to a statement that there was no 757 impact.

       Reply

       1. Craig, please add me to the list. Larry Payne, Castell, Texas. Thanks.

          Reply

    2. They have perfected the image of a stand-up govt while at the same time they circumvent our constitutional protections. Are they the good guys or the bad ? The answer is both.

       Reply

34. Nearly 600 now gathered in this big tent. Kudos to Craig McKee for this gathering and for his work in expoosing the Pentagon deceptions
    The Big Tent under which we can all rally is controlled demolition/WTC7. The BIG TENT under which we should all be focused upon gathering is WHO DID 9-11–with essential agreement upon “qui bono” and a “key suspects” list who are immediately indictable.
    Unless and until we agressively pursue gathering under the WHO DID 9-11 BIG TENT, the harvest from the lies (seven countries in five years … land grabs … growing police state … etc.) continues unabated.
    Those who are dragging their feet about WHO DID 9-11 are working for the enemy either wittingly or unwittingly. The effect of letting the real perpetrator continue their agendas is much misery inflicted upon the human journey.
    It was sarcasm, Craig, that I live in Misery, Missouri. Just Missouri is sufficient. And, my FB id is John Edward Kendrick. Welcome to all friends who are exposing who did 9-11.

    Reply

    1. CUI PRODEST SCELUS, IS FECIT. – For whom the crime advances, he has done it. – Seneca
       Most people seeking the truth about 9/11 are familiar with the PNAC document that states, “the transformation of American armed forces through “new technologies and operational concepts” was likely to be a long one, “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”, however most don’t realize the TRANSFORMATION these people have been working decades to make goes far beyond just the American armed forces. Here is evidence exposing that 9/11 was just part of a much bigger plan that most people could never imagine possible – which is exactly the way they want it to stay until it’s too late for us to do anything about it… https://www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7662

       Reply

       1. I’m right with you about the long-term agenda of world domination.
          It took two world wars to establish the Jewish state after establishing control of creation of US debt currencFederal (not) Reserve (none)–securing control of media, establishing a ministry of propaganda via Hollywood and buying Congress via bribes and blackmail.
          Look who are making the most of the demonization of the muslim world.
          New topic areas would seem appropriate. Suggestions include: Who Are The Key Suspects in 9-11? … Who Are Immediately Indictable–and Why? … Which of the first 9-11 truth groups were controlled opposition?
          Do we want to haggle about the ‘how’ for another sixteen years without agressively pursuing the real perpetrators?
          This ‘litmus test’ applies to all activists. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6O4LE0eTYc
          See who are controlled opposition.

          Reply

          1. Did you get a chance to read through all of the substantial evidence I posted, because it establishes the who, along with the how and why – yet your comment doesn’t acknowledge this?

             Reply

          2. Please don’t veer off topic on this post. Whether you want people to stop talking “haggling” about the how or not, this post is about the Pentagon and the evidence that it was not hit by a 757.

             Reply

             1. See my suggestion for other topic headings, Craig. Are we, or aren’t we about bringing the real perpetrators to justice and righting the wrongs wrought by the big lies?

             2. I question why you would want to limit people sharing information and evidence about 9/11 – you appear to be doing exactly what rediscover911com is accusing some of doing? What is the point of what you are doing if not to move us all forward towards fully uncovering and exposing the entire truth about 9/11 so we can hold those responsible accountable for their crimes, and stop them from doing more harm – which is only going to happen if we continue sharing the evidence we have uncovered with each other? Please remove my name from your list, I don’t wish to be associated with people wanting to stop people from sharing evidence about 9/11, because in doing so you are protecting those responsible for 9/11.

             3. Kelly, I simply ask people to comment on the topic. I never tried to stop anyone from sharing evidence. And suggesting that I’m protecting the perpetrators is outrageous. If you want your name off the list because I try to keep the discussion on topic then you weren’t serious to begin with.

             4. From what I’ve read of Kelly’s extensive references, she is serious about achieving justice. Thus, the need for a topic–or three–where BIG TENT issues can be hashed out.

             5. Thank you for taking the time to read the evidence I posted, I’ve been working on reading the evidence on the website you posted and adding what I didn’t know to the evidence I’ve compiled, thank you.

             6. You wrote,”Please don’t veer off topic on this postl…this post is about the Pentagon and the evidence that it was not hit by a 757″ – discouraging people from posting anything other than information about this very specific part of 9/11, so in fact attempting to control and limit the information and evidence people share about 9/11, which doesn’t make sense if you’re working to uncover and expose the truth about 9/11. It is a fact that some people that say they are working to expose the truth about 9/11, are actually frauds working for those responsible for 9/11 – by doing such things as keeping people focused on what is already known, rather than working to discover more and working towards holding those responsible accountable, so people need to be cautious about who they trust and get involved with – would you not agree? It is not outrageous to make the point that someone attempting to limit the discussion about 9/11 are protecting those responsible, because if your statement discourages someone from posting evidence that could have moved us all closer to knowing the whole truth about 9/11, than you have in fact helped those responsible, whether intending to or not.

             7. Spreading ”the word” and presenting evidence and analysis are critically important, Andy the need to do so quite urgent. However, in this instance, any such effort demonstrates one crucial weakness of an avearage 9/11 related blog page and/or forum, which is FOCUS… If every page is going to turn into a barrage and cacophony of links, evidence, arguments and counter arguments of anything and everything related to 9/11 just like any other page, expecting the reader to first recognize the presented info and then piece it all together to gain perspective from the said evidence seems quite unreasonable.
                This page, which I consider a potentially successful attempt to build a much needed feeling of solidarity between many likeminded but fractured groups and individuals, would be better off without any evidentiary or technical discussions.

             8. Those responsible for 9/11 will be ready to take the next big step forward in their one world government plan in 2018 to no later than 2020 based on the evidence I have – so we can’t afford to move slowly, we are running out of time. Read this substantial evidence that proves what I’m reporting is true, including that their Big Brother network, FirstNet, will be up and running in the U.S. and Canada very, very soon https://www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7662
                They are also working to restrict our access to information and ability to share information, including through Google and YouTube, etc., as you will see if you read the evidence I’ve posted above. So again, we are running out of time.

             9. To be honest, Kelly, we are already out of time… We have been so since 1963..

             10. To be honest, David, that’s not true. The evidence proves the one thing they fear is an informed public that knows the truth, before they are ready to handle that happening – which is why the Bilderberg group meetings are top secret and heavily guarded, and why they murdered JFK, and why 9/11 witnesses died mysteriously, and why the mainstream media they control have not said a word about their Big Brother network, FirstNet, despite it costing taxpayers $47 billion to date.

             11. David invites to the tent of resignation/surrender. We are winning the information war as more ReDiscover911 I’d sure like to carry on this discussion about activism on a new topic area. Craig? How about one of those topic titles where we can compare activist strategies?

             12. @rediscover011com
                 I admire your attitude. But, I disagree with your characterization of my words.
                 I am not giving advice, just acting as the weatherman, offering an opinion and forecast based on observations… People will need to figure out if their umbrellas are gonna cut it for themselves.
                 Here we are, all 600 of us, barely enough people to fill an Airbus 380, and we are going to discuss “strategy” on how to bring perps to justice, how to fight the internationalist geopolitical machinations, and finally win the information war. The number of people in this list will certainly rise… Can it reach 6,000? Almost certainly… Can it reach 60,000? Possible but not probable… Can it reach 6 million? 60 million?
                 In the meantime, during the 16 years we spent arguing about the technical aspects of the event, like how exactly the towers came down, or what hit the pentagon, these same globalist powers, who have had uninterrupted reign of the wealthiest and most technologically advanced nation in the world and its military might since before 1963, have already planned and set up a dozen more 9/11s. I can assure you that these people are not sitting there shaking in their boots, worrying about what they would do if we actually do “win the information war”. While we are yet to develop the so called “strategy” they have mapped out the next 30-50 years with every alternate scenario a think tank can think of.
                 There’s a storm brewing in the world, the unparalleled magnitude and the destruction of which is bound to render 9/11 just a footnote of history. When we will have finally won the information war, I am afraid we will be faced with much greater challenges that will render our “win” almost irrelevant. The time is up. We wasted it all with infighting and fending off disinformation agents, self destructive egos, and as you put it, the “how” of it all. The collective “we” have allowed them to get away with everything they have done, including the financial 9/11 in 2008 that served as the nail in the coffin.
                 In this context, I am by no means ‘inviting’ you or anyone else ‘to the tent of resignation/surrender’, but simply pointing out that you, we, I, are already sitting in that tent, trapped in it, most of us proud to be in it… the difference is that we call it the truther tent…
                 We have failed to produce a leader, a strategy, a unified voice, a momentum to affect and dominate social discourse, policy or presidential or local elections. The truth is, most of us never left the tent… We never went further than our keyboards that we mostly used to give people tongue lashings for being wrong, being dumb, for being shills, trolls, agents… Instead of chasing the magician out of town, for some reason we decided we had to first solve how exactly the magic trick was done… But couldn’t agree with each other long enough to notice that the magician is already long gone… And here we are… arguing… In the tent… perpetually only this close to winning the information war….

             13. Not only that, they are threatening to virtually poison us all via their so-called ‘G5’ WIFI plans.It is known that this technology is used as a military weapon, but generally the radiation it causes is detrimental to all nature. Yet they do not care because the corporation already worth trillions can but governments etc and think they are above the law, especially with the promise of even more filthy profits.
                 Remember also that Aaron Russo interview where he said the endgame of these fiends is to get us all chipped so as to ultimately control us. I notice, I must say though, that his friend Nelson Rockefeller who told him this (and hinted an ‘event’ was coming which would be used to create a ‘war on terror’) also used this ‘confession’ to slip in disinfo by claiming they were responsible for the women’s liberation movement. This is typical of these insane control freaks who haven’t really got one creative bone in their body. They just CO OPT ideas and movements to suit their nefarious agenda.
                 They rather very much fear the knowledge women have revealed about the ROOTS of this evil, patriarchal thinking, and so would have us believe that by them claiming they were responsible for women seeking liberation they would discredit this knowledge women have exposed about the roots of their insanity in history.
                 But Aaron in the interview expresses the unimaginable inhuman lack of empathy of these people who will laugh that they can incite an endless ‘war on terror’, and its results in all forms of suffering, death and loss.. This mockery is also very revealed in their occultism surrounding their evil actions as is shown in S.K.Bain’s book, The Most Dangerous Book in the World.

             14. I am new here Kelly but have a FREE .pdf that every member would benefit from reading. It focuses on the 9/11 Pentagon attack and the name of the publication is: “His STORY” The Prima Facie Case for MURDER Against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and the SHADOW Government. It is available to anyone who asks via my e-mail at: ios@sover.net Paperback copies will be available for anyone who, after reading the presentation, wishes to purchase it. Thank you for your help distributing this information to this important group of justice seekers. PS: There is also an interview I did with Sarah Westall that can be heard at: http://sarahwestall.com/911-pentagon-evidence-points-to-explosives/ Thank you and Merry Christmas to all. Consider this my little stocking stuffer for each of you.

35. rogermorris . remo Taranaki. Aotearoa/NZ. artist

    Reply

36. No plane crashed anywhere on 9/11. Ryan Rodrigues, New York, New York.

    Reply

37. “Of course there was a plane. It can be seen clear as day on any one of the hundreds of security cameras situated on and around the Pentagon that day.”
    Please add my name to this list and any other list associated with raising public awareness about what really happened on Sept 11 and bringing the perpetrators to justice.
    Hugh Harrison, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Reply

38. Excellent work, Craig! Please add my name to the list!

    Reply

    1. Thanks, Fred! Great to have a friend and fellow Montrealer join the list!

       Reply

39. I would like to add my name to your list. Dion Trevarthen, Aberlady, Scotland.

    Reply

40. Now that we have a sizeable portion of 9-11 leadership gathered on the Pentagon deception, consider this scenario:
    Perpetrators of 9-11 would love to discredit this large group and make the group equal “all who question the official 9-11 narratives”. Surely, in 16 years, digital manipulation of existing (confiscated) videos could be accomplished to “discredit leaders of the 9-11 truth movement”.
    What if over the past 16 years, “Digital Fakery Studios” has been fabricating videos–like the Zapruder film was modified–to discredit these 600 who question the official narrative of Flight 77?
    It worked for the JFK (Zapruder) footage–well before digital fakery was possible.

    Reply

41. Add my name to the list please:
    Inge Ørum Petersen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Reply

42. Hi Craig,
    I covered last year’s Cooper Union Justice In Focus event, wrote numerous articles for AE911Truth, and have always been a big fan of truthandshadows. Your research has been impressive on this and I’m glad to see so many paying attention! Please add me to the list.
    Jim

    Reply

43. Hi Craig, I am not on facebook. Could you please put my name on the list. Dorothy Abraham, Toronto, Canada. Thanks.
    On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Truth and Shadows wrote:
    > Craig McKee posted: ” Join Griffin, Harrit, Zwicker and more than 500 > others who stand behind evidence that a 757 impact never happened (The list > appears immediately below this article) By Craig McKee It has been more > than 16 years since 9/11, and no issue has done more t” >

    Reply

    1. Yes, thank you, Dorothy.

       Reply

44. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o68Kn-jsIpM
    Japanese Councilor Yukihisa Fujita emphatically disbelieves believes the official Pentagon story.

    Reply

45. Add my name : Alain Manseau, Quebec city, Canada

    Reply

46. please add my name to the list, craig. lynn bradbury, lubec, maine

    Reply

    1. Thanks, Lynn!

       Reply

47. We must replace the media, they cannot be reformed.

    Reply

48. I joined the List as soon as I learned about it, as have been off the Net for some time while getting together the funds for a new logic board for my laptop. There’s also an exciting new development re the Pentagon. While on the plane to NYC for the 9/11 Panel at the Left Forum,
    I happened to sit next to a couple from the California coast who had been taken on a tour of the Pentagon by a high ranking Army officer shortly after Obama became president. He revealed
    to them there that in the week or so leading up to 9/11 and on 9/11 the Pentagon was holding a series exercises on how it would respond if the building were hit by a plane, which matches the revelation by Richard Clarke in an address at the Naval Postgraduate School which
    I published on its DoD website and is quoted in ‘Behind The Smoke Curtain’ that ‘We’d
    [the Bush-Cheney Gov’t] exercised ‘it’ five times’ leading up to 9/11, of course leaving out that ‘they’ were exercising ‘it’ on 9/11 itself as well, ‘exercises’ that were ‘taken live’. In August 2002 I published the evidence even then already in the public domain that, taken together, pointed to there having been an emergency response exercise on how to respond to a plane impacting the Pentagon on 9/11 just as there were by NORAD and the NSA on 9/11; and, as you know, ‘Behind The Smoke Curtain’ marshals the evidence that though Flight 77 / a 757 didn’t
    impact the Pentagon where or when the official story claims, there was, however, an ‘exercise’ plane that did approach the building on a north vs. a south/official story path
    and was destroyed there that morning. The couple who were told about the Pentagon’s exercises on this very scenario leading up to 9/11 have given me the name and contact information of the General who told them this during the tour that he gave them of the building and I am in touch with them to get this on record. The point I’m making with
    this is that though taking a plane attack ‘exercise’ live is not the same as ‘faking a
    plane attack’, they are similar and both fall under the Proposition that no 757 hit the building.
    Barbara Honegger

    Reply

    1. Thank you Barbara Honegger for this absolutely brilliant presentation proving that NO 757 HIT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNFQ8dAf2Ho
       …I can’t wait to read your book, Behind The Smoke Curtain.

       Reply

    2. Barbara, please don’t get me wrong, I have absolutely no reason to question your research and find everything you say perfectly credible. I am just wondering how you managed to work for the DoD until 2011 and what sort of feedback (or flak!) you got from colleagues and/or students there.

       Reply

49. Add me to the list:
    Sören Backman, Shaman, Karlstad Sweden.

    Reply

50. Ad my name: Niels Juul-Jensen, Virum, Denmark

    Reply

51. Please enter my name to the list, it is something I have wanted to see for some time, and once established we should not waste any more time arguing among ourselves. I support AE911 Truth Org but have no technical qualifications.
    I am from Great Yarmouth, Norfolk in the UK.
    Congratulations.

    Reply

    1. An investigation into 9/11 will expose the evil, fierce and violent crown operating from deep within every countrys infrastructure – lets join forces and find those bastards……..

       Reply

    2. Many prominent 9-11 activists know about the connections to Israel. Other activists seem to avoid mentioning the zionist connections. We need a topic here for discussing key suspects and strategies for developing a mass awakening … “up-wising”.
       Until Craig sets up such a topic (perhaps THE BIG TENT: KEY SUSPECTS or something similar), I’m offering to host comments on my FB profile or at my comments sections at 911JusticeCampaign.org

       Reply

       1. Yes and some researchers call those who hide the obvious central Zionist involvement as being ‘controlled opposition’ especially the likes of Alex Jones whose very enterprise ‘Infowars’ is owned by Time Warner which is owned by a Jewish Zionist! In fact some say that the whole ‘9/11 NYC (etc) activism with groups shouting ‘9/11 as an inside job!!’ was pre-orchestrated by the very Zionists who planned and carried out the 9/11 false flag. ALL to divert attention away from their central role.
          I am very glad to have found you here, and have just Googled your site and will look forward to researching it later. As you know they also have put the 9/11 (etc) predictive programming and other occultism in their films etc via Hollywood. Are you familiar with this more ‘hidden in plain sight’ aspect?

          Reply

          1. Just last week I took delivery on the April 3, 1967 NEWSWEEK magazine with David Rockefeller on the cover … his watch hands pointing (nearly) to 9 and 11. Yes, I know about predictive programming.

             Reply

          2. My other website is 911JusticeCampaign.org

             Reply

52. I saw the news interview people that were in Arlington Cemetery that saw a large plane fly over the pentagon.

    Reply

53. Andrew Lowe-Watson, British composer and 9/11 activist since 2006. Norwich, England
    I have no problem with admitting that I have never understood the argument for a 757 hit.

    Reply

54. Roger Gloux add me to the list Salmon Arm, B.C.

    Reply

55. Important evidence relating to the subject of no 757 hitting The Pentagon on 9/11…
    Connect the dots…
    On September 10, 2001, the day before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld reported that there was $2.3 TRILLION missing from the DoD as a result of issues with the outdated computer systems, when the evidence proves American Management Systems – a mega corporation that serves the Bilderberg Group, which Donald Rumsfeld is a member of – was awarded the contract to revamp the DoD’s procurement computer systems – which included interfaces to DOD financial and logistics management systems as well as electronic data interchange capabilities – in 1996. Rumsfeld further reported that he planned to revamp the DoD’s computer systems to address the problem, and the evidence proves that American Management Systems, now known as CGI, were awarded the contracts to revamp the DoD’s computer systems AGAIN.
    American Management Systems, now known as CGI, was founded by 5 RAND Corporation experts known as the Department of Defense Whiz Kids, who developed Operation Northwoods and are directly connected to ALL the people involved in 9/11.
    Whiz Kids was a name given to a group of experts from RAND Corporation with which Robert McNamara surrounded himself in order to turn around the management of the United States Department of Defense (DoD) in the 1960s.”…The purpose was to shape a modern defense strategy in the Nuclear Age by bringing in economic analysis, operations research, game theory, computing, as well as implementing modern management systems to coordinate the huge dimension of operations of the DoD.
    The RAND Corporation (“Research ANd Development”) is an American nonprofit global policy think tank created in 1948 by Douglas Aircraft Company to offer research and analysis to the United States Armed Forces. It is financed by the U.S. government and private endowment, corporations, universities and private individuals. General Henry H. Arnold, commander of the United States Army Air Forces, established Project RAND with the objective of looking into long-range planning of future weapons.
    Donald Rumsfeld is a RAND Corporation participant and was Chairman of the Board of the RAND Corporation from 1981 to 1986, and then from 1995 – 1996.
    The evidence supports the founders of American Management Systems, now known as CGI, were involved in developing Operation Northwoods…
    “Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against the Cuban government, that originated within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other U.S. government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba. The plans detailed in the document included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The proposals were rejected by the Kennedy administration…Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed (Bilderberg Group participant) Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963.”
    Part of Operation Northwoods involved having a passenger airliner take off and then switching it with a remote control military drone and having it crash into a target and blaming it on Cuba… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rp3P2wDKQK4
    American Management Systems, now known as CGI, has a substantial relationship with the U.S. military, including contracts relating to aviation and missiles…
    “CGI awarded $92.5M in contracts to support U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) programs
    Services to help bolster aviation, missile and calibration materiel readiness to optimize joint warfighter capabilities “We are honoured to once again be chosen to support the U.S. Army through our continued engagement with these critical AMCOM programs that directly support the warfighter,” said Tim Hurlebaus, President, CGI Federal. “CGI has the subject matter expertise and contract experience to deliver unique insight into these AMCOM programs and processes.”
    https://www.cgi.com/en/2017-07-19-CGI-awarded-92-5M-in-contracts-to-support-U-S-Army-Aviation-and-Missile-Command-AMCOM-programs
    Very conveniently for those responsible for the DoD’s missing $2.3 TRILLION – the day after Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion was missing from the Defense Department, a missile crashed into, or something exploded in, the accounting offices at The Pentagon, causing extensive loss of documentary evidence relating to the missing $2.3 trillion, which they then fraudulently blamed on terrorists, lying about it being a hijacked plane that hit The Pentagon just like they planned to do in Operation Northwoods.
    The evidence further proves that as a direct result of the false flag attacks on 9/11, CGI has been awarded defence contracts worth TRILLIONS – and still counting – and have gained extreme power over Americans and Canadians, and people around the world, as a result of the changes to laws and our rights that were justified by 9/11.
    To learn much more about AMS’s/CGI’s involvement in 9/11 – https://www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7662

    Reply

    1. Ms. Richard,
       Regarding two-time chairman of RAND Corporation and U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld …
       People will come up with varying description and/or assessment of importance to the 9/11 Truth movement’s cause of a 3-minute video record of Donald Rumsfeld by We Are Change. We suggest Donald Rumsfeld’s shocking statement during the amazing brief encounter where he feigns ignorance of Building 7 “connects the dots”, and therefore categorizes this Rumsfeld “testimony” as historic.
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdbknSpnt2A

       Reply

       1. I agree this is one more piece of the substantial evidence that proves Rumsfeld’s involvement in orchestrating 9/11. Rumsfeld is disgustingly dishonest and his behaviour is clearly consistent with someone who is guilty.
          Turn this around and point it right back at him…
          “Our task, your task… is to try to connect the dots before something happens. People say, ‘Well, where’s the smoking gun?’ Well, we don’t want to see a smoking gun from a weapon of mass destruction.” Donald Rumsfeld

          Reply

    2. In beginning to read your comment something rang out to me. You say that Rumsfeld the very day before 9/11 reports trillions missing. It was the numbers. I recently have been watching very good videos exposing how these Zionists encode their films and so on, and the number ’23’ seems to be very important to them, so seeing him state $2.3 trillion rings out to me
       The perps behind 9/11, the Zionists, seem to love the number 23, (9/11/2001 (9+11+2+1 = 23)) checkout this video:
       THE NUMBER 23 – Dog/Sirius/Birthday #911 – EXTENDED
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkhV54fjioY

       Reply

56. Please add my name:
    Tom Turner
    (Designer)
    Moseley
    Birmingham
    UK

    Reply

57. You can add me to the list. I worked with Elizabeth Woodworth on a number of 911 events over a number of years.
    Mike Zimmer
    Victoria BC

    Reply

58. So so proud of our Danish truthers. You all are truly part of why I moved to Copenhagen. Great initiative here – I’m going to share your list on as many social media outlets as I’m able. Thank you for continuing to be some of the hardest working truthers out there. I and millions of others around the world thank you. Please add my name to this list.
    P.S. I thought I had posted this already, but wasn’t sure it had gone through. If so, please feel free to delete one or the other. 🙂

    Reply

59. Please add me

    Reply

    1. Under what name? And can I add a city?

       Reply

60. Add me to the list, Heidi Clausen, Copenhagen DK

    Reply

61. Add me to the list

    Reply

62. Richard Amelang, piano technician, Bethesda, MD
    one of my clients was an eyewitness, and negated the passenger jet story

    Reply

63. Yes add me please. And thanks for your work and to all the sincere contributors. Jim Bedinghaus, AE911Truth, St Petersburg, FL

    Reply

64. My late friend Bob recognized the treason of 9/11 on that morning. He was also aware that no airplane hit the Pentagon. Although Bob passed away in August of 2013, I’m sure he would have been pleased to be on your list. Thank you for all your efforts, Craig.
    Lt. Col. (USAF-ret.) Robert M. Bowman, PhD – Melbourne, FL (also founder, The Patriots – thepatriots.us)

    Reply

    1. Yes, Bowman was one of those rare individuals, a truther from day one.
       And I second Michael Lurie’s comments about Bowman understanding that a large jetliner did not hit the Pentagon. Bowman came to Cincinnati at the invitation of Cincinnati 9/11 truth. He appeared on our Public Access TV show, giving his inaugural address were he to have become President.
       I sat next to him in the restaurant afterwards. (Cincinnati’s famous Montgomery Inn.) He was not familiar specifically with the work of CIT and the unearthing of the north path, but he already knew a jetliner did not hit the building. I caught him up on the witness testimonies, including flyaway witness Roosevelt Roberts, and he said it all basically confirmed what he knew.

       Reply

       1. Is there something in print confirming his view or a video where he says it?

          Reply

          1. I can try to find it. I’m pretty sure he did say it in print or on video at some point somewhere. But I do know that Dr. Bowman, regardless of his position, did not like the “infighting” over the issue. So he didn’t talk about it publicly much.

             Reply

          2. Although he doesn’t come out and declare it, if you’ll go to the 5:30 mark in this video you’ll see he definitely questioned the official version of the Pentagon event –
             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMqqdL6tbTM

             Reply

65. Tusind tak (a thousand thanks) to all the danes who have added themselves to the list!

    Reply

    1. And thank you as well Peter Andersen, for being one of the Danes taking a stand – it is incredible to see so many Danes stepping forward and supporting this list. Finally we see some of the hard 9/11 Truth information activism that have been running in Denmark since 2006, starting to pay of. I said it for a few years now, Denmark is the best educated population in Europe regarding the 9/11 Truth evidence. The locomotive in this push of evidence, is without a doubt Niels Harrits more then 350 lectures about WTC7, in 15 different countries (mostly Denmark), in the last 11 years.

       Reply

66. Thanks for standing up to a bunch of pseudo “scientific” intellectual bullies over the years, Craig McKee. We are so much better informed about questionable pressure and suppression tactics thanks to your writings in Truth and Shadows Blog. Some of the “Pentagon Jet Plane Theorists” do not respect the rights of others to have a different opinion in the 9/11 Truth & Justice Movement, and some of them have engaged in a campaign of defamation of characters of those who oppose them. Congratulations on this astounding response from the 9/11 Truth & Justice activist community!

    Reply

    1. Thanks, Vic.

       Reply

67. Actually, it was the obvious sincerity of the ‘non-white’ citco witnesses, interviewed by CIT (including Lloyd’s ‘on/off’, of course), that first convinced me some 10 years ago of a ‘no impact’ scenario. Some of the ‘white-ones’ interviewed, simply contributed to the certainty!
    (Especially him, you know, the ‘funny one’, who’s name escapes me at the moment).
    Please add me to the list.
    K. Kastberg, Queensland, Australia. (Though still a Danish Citizen)!

    Reply

    1. I’m afraid I don’t get what the skin color of the witnesses has to do with what they said.

       Reply

       1. Neither do I, my dear Craig McKee …neither do I! (sigh)
          My post was a response to Vic Sadot above, who wrote: “Thanks for standing up to a bunch of pseudo “scientific” intellectual bullies over the years, Craig McKee. ….”
          And by extension – to your own very lucid article about “Chandler and his team of ‘intrepid’ Pentagon researchers.”
          I will not waste my time trying to find the name of the ‘funny one’ (as it’s unimportant), but he was the one (a TV commentator of sorts), who first ‘saw’ the wings folding back on impact, but in a later interview told us he couldn’t see the impact because some trees or bushes obscured his view!! Enough of him ….
          Am I added to the list?
          Cheers

          Reply

          1. djeminy, I believe you’re referring to Mike Walter of USA Today. Yes, his story was funny. It certainly wasn’t believable.
             And I can add you to the list for sure, but I would prefer if I can list a real name with city and country. Online made-up names don’t impress people very much.

             Reply

             1. Yes, he’s the ‘man’ I had in mind! Thanks.
                I gave you my ‘real name’ already! Why do you think it’s a “made-up” name??
                Cheers

68. 911 truth will change the world in incredible ways, and that is exactly what we need right now.

    Reply

69. Ad me please Jytte Borch, Stestrup Danmark

    Reply

    1. Done!

       Reply

70. This may or may not be of interest, but just out of curiosity I checked ae911truth.org to see if I was listed, since I am pretty sure I signed the petition, but I am not there. Nor is David Ray Griffin! Did I miss it?
    Kudos to Craig for publishing this list in a simple and accessible format!

    Reply

    1. And I see that the ae911 petition only has somewhat less than 3000 signatures. Compare that to over 700 who are putting their names on the line for a much more specific statement. The ae911 petition is very weak, just saying a “new investigation” is needed. Duh. I consider this petition much more significant. I have sent the link to a number of people, e.g., Paul Craig Roberts, who has not yet signed up, and I won’t mention the other names. A couple of (otherwise) intelligent people seem to be deathly afraid of the “honeypot” theory, and others just do not respond. I just shake my head in sorrow and an anger that I don’t know how to express.

       Reply

       1. I would caution against making it sound like we are in competition with the AE petition. It’s also slightly an apples-and-oranges comparison because the AE petition requires specific credentials in architecture or engineering, and all of these individuals and their credentials are painstakingly verified to weed out fakes. It took a long time for the AE petition to get to 700 because of this verification process, and the fact that it is done by a team of unpaid volunteers. I was part of this team back in 2008 and 2009.
          By contrast, the beauty of this Pentagon statement is that it does not require specific credentials in order for one’s name to be on it, though it is certainly strengthened by those who do have credentials in architecture, engineering, piloting and Air Traffic Control. Among others. As a result it has gotten to 700 relatively quickly. And the beauty of this is the there is no point for any fakes to put their name to the statement, because there would be no one to discredit but themselves. Whereas with the AE petition, an anti truth agent could sign the petition and say they have a Ph.D in Structural Engineering from Emory University. Then, if the verification team doesn’t do their job thoroughly enough and this fake slips through the cracks and on to the public petition, the fake can then go to JREF or other debunker forum and boast about how easy it is to discredit the AE petition, and how the sloppiness of their team represents the sloppiness of conspiracy theorists in general, yada ya.

          Reply

          1. I agree. Definitely apples and oranges. And let’s give credit to AE911Truth for having more than 400,000 likes on Facebook!

             Reply

71. Yes, the “honeypot” theory is really grasping at straws. If they’d really wanted to discredit truthers they would have released the video a long time ago to nip it in the bud.

    Reply

72. Mike Palecek
    Saginaw, Minn.
    The New American Dream Radio Show
    Penn Magazine

    Reply

73. Jack S Kimball,
    Californian

    Reply

74. Larry Payne
    Castell, Texas

    Reply

75. Stephen McGregor
    Wellington, New Zealand and Istanbul, Turkey.

    Reply

76. Sally Morales, UK, independent observer & researcher, 9/11 was the most foul false flag to date, the next one could be global and so much worse (Aliens, UFO, ETs all fake and the whole show run by humans)

    Reply

77. Honoured to add my name!
    David Brooks Deaton
    Saint John, Canada

    Reply

    1. Thanks, David!

       Reply

78. Please add my name to your list, Craig.
    Jacqui S. Dorset. UK

    Reply

79. Add Dick Croy, Cincinnati.

    Reply

80. Thanks so much to those who have added their names. Spread the word and help us get even more!

    Reply

    1. Please add my name: Rudy List, Dexter, Michigan

       Reply

       1. Yes, count me in, member A&E 9/11 Truth Richard A. (Dick) Kennedy, Shelby Twp. Michigan

          Reply

81. Thank you for years of work on this travesty. It’s incomprehensible to me how citizens think speaking out for the truth hurts the good of the country. Even though most Americans believe JFK ‘s investigation was a cover up,they are reluctant(understatement) to come forward and look at an obvious,massive,successful Governmental assisted murder plot.

    Reply

82. Tim Roemer, member of 9/11 Commission, says missile hit the Pentagon in CNN interview…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUmr9dFbf2c

    Reply

    1. Rumsfeld said missile hit The Pentagon in October 12, 2001 interview…
       “Secretary Rumsfeld Interview with Parade Magazine
       Presenter: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
       October 12, 2001
       (Interview with Lyric Wallwork Winik, Parade Magazine)
       …Q: This is a question that’s been asked by many Americans, but especially by the widows of September 11th. How were we so asleep at the switch? How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?
       Rumsfeld: There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it’s thousands. And the task is to sort through it and see what you can find. And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing — the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it’s an investigative service as opposed to a police force, it’s not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues.
       They [find a lot] and any number of terrorist efforts have been dissuaded, deterred or stopped by good intelligence gathering and good preventive work. It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it’s physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the MISSILE to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center…”
       http://archive.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3845

       Reply

83. So did Bill Clinton.

    Reply

    1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5HcmTOAGVk

       Reply

84. I agree no 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11. I am a Vietnam-era Veteran from Arizona and member of many groups including Tucson for 9/11 truth.

    Reply

85. Author of After 9/11 Truth: The Death Star in Ashes, Humanity Rises (http://bit.ly/2tKCzAY_After_911_Truth). NFW that a 757 was even close to the Pentagon on 9/11.

    Reply

    1. Brian, that link doesn’t work for me but I found it on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/After-11-Truth-Death-Humanity/dp/1507662416/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1514018729&sr=8-1&keywords=after+9%2F11+truth.
       That led me to look at the Free State site, which I didn’t know about. I might be tempted to join you if I didn’t live in Germany! How does the idea of “9/11 is an absurd cover story for a horrendous false-flag act of state terror perpetrated by a rogue cabal of US and US-allied global control-freak insiders” (your Amazon blurb) go down with “Free Staters”? I agree of course. My own theory of “transparency” (i.e., intentional transparency) follows from (and explains) the absurdity.

       Reply

86. “….. more than 650 from 35 countries and six continents (so far)”
    What? ….. not one from Antarctica? ….. You’ll have to work a little harder, Craig, c’mon. 😉

    Reply

    1. I might know a couple of penguins who aren’t buying the story…

       Reply

       1. Ha ha! 😉

          Reply

       2. Ha ha from me too!
          (I’m at the store testing out laptop keyboards as I type.)

          Reply

          1. That one works great.

             Reply

             1. Ha, I mean the user-friendliness of the keyboards, not whether they work or not. But yes, the last laptop I bought I bought online, at a site called Newegg. Never again am I ordering a computer from anywhere other than an old-fashioned store. I’m back on this same computer again after having tested a bunch of others now. Think I’ll buy. Then I can get back to being more active blogging-wise.

             2. Excellent.

       3. I have bridges for sale for the people that believe any of the events of 9/11 that the Peoples Republic of the USA has told us

          Reply

87. We Live in the Peoples Republic of the USA, And we are letting this happen, WAKE UP PEOPLE !!!

    Reply

88. Please add my name to the list:
    Ray Jones
    Rishton
    UK

    Reply

89. Please add my name to the list. Ray Wolfe, PE, MIMS, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Aurora, Mo.

    Reply

    1. I will, thanks.

       Reply

90. Airborne firebomb at pentagon firehouse , no wide body Boeing .

    Reply

    1. Nonsense!
       There was a large airliner.
       All the credible witnesses who were in a position to see the plane close-up described a large airliner flying North of the Citgo gas station.
       Where did you get your “information” from?

       Reply

91. I was originally fully accepting the “official” explanation, but when some friends began to point me toward the evidence of the impossibility of the “official” story, I changed my mind. It was very difficult to do so, but no other choice existed. I do not believe a 757 airliner hit the Pentagon.
    Paul F List
    Newberry MI ‘Michigan Upper Peninsula”

    Reply
92. Pingback: Stand with us: add your name to the ‘No 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11’ list! | USA Today 24x7

93. When will ‘we the people’ figure out how to put a stop to this?
    D. Dalip, India

    Reply

94. Of course all these 700 people have never watched this film, because they don’t know how to deal with reality. And if they deny all the data and chain of evidence presented in this film, then they themselves must be coincidence theorist. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon kids, grow up, and McKee says you are wrong if you believe there was only a 16 ft hole on the second floor of the Pentagon, so there goes your whole premise for the theory of no plane in the first place. https://youtu.be/_omKXktAnVM

    Reply

    1. That is quite a distortion you’ve presented (is this Nelson Martins, by any chance?). No serious researcher bases their contention that no impact took place on a claim that the hole was just 16 feet. To say that 700 people on this list “don’t know how to deal with reality” shows where you are coming from and how “serious” you are.

       Reply

       1. Yes this is Nelson, does this mean that I’ll actually get a more detailed response from you here rather than what you also cant handle on Facebook? It’s not that researchers base their contention that no impact took place on a claim that the hole was just 16 feet, a real researcher would know that the hole was much bigger and that indeed flight 77 struck it if they actually looked at the evidence for what it is and not by introduction of cherry picked photos. It’s that a bunch of fans of 9/11 conspiracy documentaries, that do base their contention that an impact took place on a claim of just a 16 feet hole on the 2nd story, and It’s quite clear that you have many people in your group, who may or may not read your blog but still pander and follow to that classic belief of a 16 ft hole belief still, along with missiles and so on, meaning you have people in your group who dont meet with you’re CIT criteria (the one that you don’t even know the actual rules to in regards to Craig Ranke’s thorough explanations).

          Reply

    2. I agree with Craig that the video you’ve posted djthermaldetonator is not credible. I suggest anyone wanting to see a credible presentation of the facts should watch this brilliant presentation by Barbara Honegger… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNFQ8dAf2Ho

       Reply

       1. You or Craig would not know whether my film was credible or not, because by the general blanket statement you left, clearly meant that you didn’t even watch it, and were just certain to already doubt anything I said or posted. Craig doesn’t support Honegger’s theory anyway so whats you’re point? Explain what is not credible about my film? Where and why is the thesis wrong? Explain how their lacks a chain of evidence? It’s a 70-minute film and it covers a range of topics between Dulles plus some of Logan Airport, some of the airfone calls and the Dragnet investigation identifying all 19 hijackers, in a timeline. So again, explain what is not credible, there is a chronology here you need to debunk.

          Reply

          1. I have David Griffin’s 9/11 Ten Years Later and if he got anything wrong, I’d like to know what. I do not have 7 minutes, much less 7, to spend chasing rabbits.

             Reply

             1. David Ray Griffin endorsed this presentation proving ‘NO 757 HIT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11’ by Barbara Honegger… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNFQ8dAf2Ho

             2. mdmorrissey, what David Griffin has wrong is that he has never gone over all the conversations that were held about the details of what was going on each of all 4 flights and take into account into the numerous inconsistencies with the hijackers, weapons, scenario and so on that has plays as a chain of evidence to other portions of 9/11 that are covered up and completely unknown by official defenders and even those the truth movement, that it does support the evidence indeed that flight 77 did hit the Pentagon BUT, that authorities don’t actually know who all the hijackers were plus, it leaves a open inquiry into Flight 93 and Shanksville. 9/11 cannot be explained in 7 minutes not even in a 3 Hour film. It is not some simple Blockbuster to be entertained by, it is a serious and complex matter and it is a bigger human operational conspiracy than what the official version has covered up and what the truth movement thinks.

             3. What nonsense.

          2. What you have said is not true. I did in fact watch the entire video you posted, and found it reports information that is not credible – it focuses on irrelevant and false information, and unjustly attacks members of the 9/11 truth movement, while failing to prove anything. The very credible and detailed evidence brilliantly presented by Barbara Honegger in the video I posted with my reply is consistent with what I’ve discovered doing extensive research on the subject. There never were any hijackers – 9/11 was an inside job from beginning to end using military drones, along with explosives and a missile, exactly as described in the false flag plan Operation Northwoods, developed by members of the CFR.

             Reply

             1. I’m sorry to be blunt but your response is absolutely immature irresponsible and childish, and is a clear indication you did not watch the film at all. if you found that the source of the reports and information not to be credible, then I have some unfortunate news for you, that means that the reports and information that you have found and used by the same sources (mainstream media) providing that the World Trade Center was brought down with the addition of explosives (the only cohesive belief this movement has and that were all bound together on some degree), is not credible either, and is relevant and false information. No witness accounts, no newscaster reports can be trusted whatsoever; extreme confirmation bias is the rule. ‘6 on 77’ praises certain members of the 9/11 truth community while justly criticizes members in it without necessarily going over specific names, which doesn’t matter anyway, because I am under the assumption here, that most of the people take issue with Alex Jones anyways, and he is the main promoter for flight 77 denial. I’ve already debunked Barbara’s presentations over her alleged myths of flight 77 hijackers being alive and attempting to marginalize the 28 pages, but it makes no sense for you to refer to her work while defending Craig McKee, when one is a pro-planer and the other is a no-planer, it becomes what is called, a no-brainer. Barbara hasn’t thoroughly researched the alive claims of Khalid Almihdhar and Salem Alhazmi (i have) nor has she interviewed anybody who was there at the Pentagon or Dulles or any of the passenger families of flight 77, and besides, the CCTV video is now authenticated and I know much more about it and all the other additional cameras throughout Dulles that captured the hijackers walking through It, and you don’t want to know or deal with that, because its going to destroy your bubble and alternate reality fallacy that’s made you this delusional. There were plenty of hijackers, more than you and I know, more or less than even the officials knew (more than they could even identify)If it was all fake and it was all scripted, then please explain why the authorities initially thought there was three to six hijackers, and then 18 hijackers, and then 19 hijackers, and still couldn’t show any of the hijacker photos practically a month later if they had this thing all down prepared with the Military? The theories become irrelevant when you omit the other cover ups to the fact there were more planes meant to be hijacked on 9/11 that has also been covered up tremendously, besides than assuming that 9/11 was meant to be a jet plane crash to cover up a first time attempt to bring down the WTC. 9/11 was not a military attack there was no drones there was no need for drones there is no prior example of military attacking its own military and civilians, 9/11 is not what the loyal Truther Alex Jones promoted as Operation Northwoods, it’s called the Bojinka Plot and it has all to do with a 1993 bombing that you nor Alex Jones don’t know a damn thing about. Fail, try over again. Science will not solve 911 because you people have no history to defend your theories with, even if you wanted to blame Israel. You suck at it. I will destroy any of your arguments assuming that Israel pulled off 9/11 without Saudi Arabia.

             2. The evidence proves who is credible, and who is not – I encourage anyone interested to view both of the videos we posted and to decide for themselves what and who to believe. I believe what you’ve written is a ridiculous bunch of nonsense – clearly my posting valid and credible evidence touched a nerve, exposing your true intentions and motives posting comments here.

          3. I tried to watch your video. I got 2 minutes in and the assumptions presented to that point were more than I was willing to assume, knowing what I already know. No point in going deeper for me. Sorry. I’ve watched so many videos and generally decide within the first few minutes whether they are worthy of my time. I don’t have to agree with the narrator or information to watch these if I think I can glean some bits of truth. Some I may watch multiple times if they pique my interest and help piece together the big puzzle.
             “Of course all these 700 people have never watched this film, because they don’t know how to deal with reality.” – Prideful Assumer.
             So count me among the 700 that haven’t watched the video and who doesn’t agree with your version of reality. In my version, no commercial aircraft hit the pentagon on September 11 2001. Physical evidence of hijackers, let alone a plane, existed no where in the impact zone.
             .

             Reply

             1. Poolman, If you couldn’t get past the first two minutes then you are in a deep state of confirmation bias and you shouldn’t trust any of the claims either that there were explosives in the World Trade Center either, since all those claims come from the mainstream news sources which are the first two minutes of the film. You’ve basically debunked you’re own source for your reason of being in the 9/11 truth movement. Goodbye.

95. Just listened to you on the Cheryl show. Very good concept you have in forming this group/list. Please add my name to the list: Yonnik Faulkner, Albany NY.

    Reply

    1. Thanks, Yonnik. Glad you liked the interview. Glad to have you aboard, and I appreciate your comment about the list.

       Reply

96. Buildings that withstood hurricane winds during decades,and in ten seconds they were pulverized.
    And in the same day the acrobatic pirouettes of two invisible planes in the Pentagon and Shanksville.
    It is only credible in cartoons.

    Reply

    1. The plane at the Pentagon was not invisible.
       It was seen close-up, flying low and slow and “banking right” by numerous witnesses who were interviewed on camera in the positions they were when they witnessed the plane.
       Two of the witnesses who described the flight path independently and identically, were Pentagon Police Officers.
       They were both able to clearly see the Plane, despite at least one of them not having eyes in the back of his head.

       Reply

97. This was a lie from square one. Give us the Truth.

    Reply

98. Please add me to the list. The evidence and physics is empirical proof. I support AE 911 Truth.

    Reply

    1. Thanks, Mike. Can we put a city and country next to your name?

       Reply

99. The American people were lied to on that day. The evidence is clear and undeniable. The truth is in the details of what actually took place. JFK and Dr. King spoke about the military industrial complex (MIC) and its humanistic beliefs. They were both assasinated…the rabbit hole is real. September 11 was a false flag operation…follow the money. Millions of good people died and will continue to die. We the people of planet earth must wake up and take action against the MIC, the Banksters, and the Global Elite. We must lift the vail and reveil the truth behind the curtain of lies, before its too late. Let us not forget that famous quote, “absolute power, corrupts absolutely”.

    Reply

100. Craig, please add my name. You continue to do a great job peeling away the whitewash.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Mark!

        Reply

101. Late on this one – please add my name Craig. M.K. Styllinski, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

     Reply

102. Add my name to list. No large plane impact! Very helpful informative site. Thank you!
     Ann Hendricks Grand Portage, Minnesota

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Ann!

        Reply

        1. Craig, thank you so much for your dedication and work.I read your article on the South Tower tilt and was stunned by that accompanying photo.”The South Tower gives it away.”Who is credited for the photo, and does it appear elsewhere? (in a video, on a newscast?)   It is profound.Thank you.Ann
           Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

           Reply

        2. I found the video with South Tower collapse.  Thank you, Craig. Kindest regards,Ann Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

           Reply

103. Harry Bornemann, ae911truth.org, citizeninvestigationteam.com, 911-archiv.net, Guadalajara, Mexico

     Reply

104. You can add me to the list as well:
     Robin Adair
     Freelance Writer
     Glendale Ca USA

     Reply

105. Fred arcuri Sauquoit NY
     Fifteen years of fighting I would be proud to have my name added.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Fred!

        Reply

106. Add me to the list as well.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Matt!

        Reply

107. I’m definitely in on this sane, accurate and logical awareness of the reality at the Pentagon. Add my name please. Gunar Roze, Toronto, Canada

     Reply

     1. I appreciate it, Gunar! We need more Canadians!

        Reply

108. Proud to join your list!
     Carolyn Danielson, Des Moines, IA, USA

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Carolyn! We’re proud to have you!

        Reply

109. According to the photos I’ve seen the Pentagon was not hit by a airliner.

     Reply

     1. David Schadeberg Peoria, Arizona, USA. Please add my name to your list.

        Reply

        1. Thanks, David!

           Reply

110. For sure, no 757 hit the Pentagon!

     It was some kind of guided drone!

     Also, a plane DID fly over the Arlington cemetery, as multiple witnesses testify to, but it was seen to bank, and Not to continue flying straight!

     Reply

111. Paul Donnelly
     Newry
     County Down.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Paul! Hey, I’ve been to Newry! Went to a drama festival in Dundalk in 1991 and then drove north to visit relatives near Belfast. I love Ireland!

        Reply

112. The hijacked planes, and the four plane crashes, were an illusion, created on our televisions and in our minds.

     marsh collins West Saint Paul Manitoba Canada

     Reply

113. I’m in disbelief that ANYONE would believe that a plane hit the pentagon. I mean SERIOUSLY? IF it did, then Scotty beamed up the remains to the Starship Enterprise.

     Reply

114. Michal Sokolowski – Moncton NB, Canada
     Of course, there was NO 757 hit the Pentagon, where is the wreckage? This only scratches the surface of the 9/11 crimes. What about the hundreds of cameras around the Pentagon and all we get is one doctored parking lot video showing a chemtrail of what most definitely was a cruise missile. The BS of the official narrative is unbelievable.
     What about the claimed ‘Saudi Hijackers’ …….no video of the terrorists entering any airport, no video of them buying tickets, going through security, sitting and waiting in the departure area and of course NO VIDEO of them getting on the flights…why not when there are literally hundreds of cameras at every airport at every corner? They produced a scant video of one or two, said to be terrorists, but the date and time stamps are suspiciously missing on these very grainy and very short videos so they could have been taken any time?
     The same issue is with the passengers of the ‘doomed’ flights. The same missing videos of them buying tickets, going through security, sitting and waiting in the departure area and of course NO VIDEO of them getting on the flights. Why not?

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Michael, for those excellent points. I have added you to our list!

        Reply

115. Memphis, TN USA

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Derek!

        Reply

116. 9/11/01 was a false flag terrorist attack perpetrated against We The People by our own government, in coordination with an evil world wide cabal of psychopaths. But to answer the question…. No. I do not think a plane hit the Pentagon. I think it was a surgical strike. That’s my opinion.

     Reply

117. The catastrophic consequences of the false flag of 911 should be reinvestigated so that this so called War on Terror can end.

     Reply

118. Just read your “Why I Choose to Stand Up …” piece and the accompanying links. Add me to the list.

     In retrospect: I was part of the organizing committee (along with the DC 9/11 collective) to revisit, on the 10th anniversary, the events of 9/11. What better place to do it then from a penthouse conference room of the Sheraton Pentagon City hotel overlooking the navy annex, the Citgo station and the west facade of the Pentagon?

     There were many interesting and revealing presentations at the conference but none more important, at least to me, than the following exchange with a hotel employee.

     When i was checking in a baggage handler asked me in a friendly way the purpose of my visit. I briefly replied we were going to examine and discuss, among other things, the events of 9/11 as they related to the Pentagon. His face widened and said (I paraphrase) “… oh yeah, I remember that. A plane did some damage to the hotel’s roof antennas which needed repair. Hope I can get some time to catch your conference.”

     For the geographically challenged, to do such damage the “plane” had to be well north of the Citgo station.

     A number of years later when I related this anecdote to WC, his answer is best described as incoherent. But he did attend the conference, unlike Kevin Ryan who boycotted it and refused to send us copies of his then latest book to sell at the conference (“You can get them on Amazon”).

     In the perhaps apocryphal words of Butch Cassidy: “Who are those guys?”

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Frank. I have added your name.

        That is a very interesting bit of information about potential damage to the hotel’s antennas. Something to be followed up, I think. Of course, this would not interest Coste because he has only one purpose: to attack any information suggesting that the plane didn’t hit or that it was on a different flight path.

        Reply

119. Anyone in his right frame of mind and some basic knowledge of Maths, chemistry and physics would reject the official pseudoscience offered by the US government. Please add my name to your list.

     Reply

120. Hey Craig…Could you please add me to the 911 & other Deep State Crimes list-server, s’il vous plaits? (ignore spelling errors)

     …and to this list, if you’re still keeping it up.

     PS To add more fun to the mix, I’d throw in Rebekah Roth’s 3-rd-in-the-trilogy entry, where she gives location advice (Gps? can’t remember) to a Chesapeake Bay location. Found it on G-maps and had the thought that if “magnet fishing” were as much a “thang” in Maryland as it is in the English canals, we could get together a crew and magnet-fish for missile blast shields (which I think are ferrous materials, tho they might be tungsten-based?) Wouldn’t it be a hoot to find the tell-tale missile detritus under the awning of a crab-cakes emporium? Also, the missile family, from Cruise to Redstone rockets, has myriad configuration options. One interesting one would be a set-up with ‘bunker buster’ time delay, and then canister charges (cluster bombs) that would deploy once the bunker buster got to the inside, and thus mimic the blast effects of a bomb or bombs that had been “previously placed” in the affected Pentagram areas. (the A-ring auditors would still have to be taken out by separately-placed devices).

     Reply

     1. Hi Bill. Yes, I’ll add you to the list serve. I assume I should use the same email address we have for the agenda and minutes?

        And thanks for adding your name to the No 757 list. I am indeed still keeping it up.

        Reply

121. 911 was all lies add me Sydney NSW AUSTRALIA

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Mathew!

        Reply

122. I know a plane difnt hot it cuz my coworkers u
     husband was there that day & called her to let her know before news hits that hes ok from some bomb explosion happen in a different corner that he was in. So next day we asked what husband say & she said she wadny allowed to talk about it at all & walked away. Do yes it was a bomb or from a middle exploding since i have seen the video on a missile flying into building.

     Reply

123. 9/11 is ALL a lie.

     Reply

     1. So can we add you to the list, Giuseppe?

        Reply

124. Add me! 9/11 was inside job
     From Fremont, Ne

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Donald!

        Reply

125. studied this very carefully from the very earliest photos and witness testimony….no plane hit the building

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Mick!

        Reply

126. Add my name to the list please.

     David Ian McIntosh, North Wales, U.K 👍

     Reply

     1. Thanks, David!

        Reply

127. Add me, from Sweden

     Reply

128. We know a missile hit the Pentagon, probably to cover up the missing billions and to thwart the pending audit…We also know the WTCenter was an inside job, stealing all the gold from the building’s vault(s), as well as providing an excuse to attack Iraq for their wealth and natural resources, as well as punishment for scraping the Dollar and refusing a Central Bank run by the NWO “Elite”…The Rothschild’s, Warburg’s, Harriman’s, the Queen, the Pope, Rockefeller’s, Bush’s, etc., etc….It may take some time, but know when the dominoes begin to fall, your Fate will no longer be in your own hands…There will be no safe haven for you all or your families and you will pay the penalty for your crimes…That includes you Deep State Traitors as well…You will fall first…MAGA…Trump On, you maggots…

     Reply

     1. So we can add you, Doug?

        Reply

129. No plane hit the pentagon

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Terrence! Can we add a city and country to your name on the list?

        Reply

130. I totally agree!! There is NO WAY the damage done was from a plane, Not even a small plane would fit in that hole!!!

     I am from Ocala Fl USA

     Reply

     1. I agree! Thanks, Marilyn!

        Reply

131. Supporter for many years
     Add my name please?

     Reply

     1. I’ve added you, Trish! Thanks. Can I add a city and country?

        Reply

132. Thanks for your hard work! Truth!

     Reply

     1. So we can add you, Kathryn?

        Reply

133. No plane hit the Pentagon. Carmel, IN

     Reply

     1. Thanks, David!

        Reply

134. Agree.

     Reply

     1. If you want to be on the list, you have to give us a full name along with city of residence. Thanks.

        Reply

135. https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/F77pentagon.pdf

     Just curious have you seen this document?

     Thanks

     Reply

     1. Yes, I have. I haven’t looked at it closely in quite a while, though.

        Reply

136. Please add me to your list. Power to The People!! Cynthia Cappello, Nashville, Tennessee

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Cynthia!

        Reply

137. Ahti Randmere, Estonia

     Reply

     1. Thank you, Ahti!

        Reply

138. Add me to the list. Too many unanswered questions and scant evidence to back it up.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Marty! Can I put a city next to your name?

        Reply

139. Power and control the elites bankers control all the agenda abolish America bring in the NWO Rothschild Morgan Rockefeller elites control the fed and central bank the governments and medias wake up

     Reply

140. Add me

     Reply

141. Add me. Júlia Krymskaya. Moscow, Russia.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Julia!

        Reply

142. No planes hit WTC 7 , no planes hit the Pentagon , no planes hit either twin tower.

     I’m from America the land where it’s free to think , but looking at pharmaceutical drugs and vaccine deaths I see many choose not to think .

     Reply

143. No “airliner” hit the Pentagon, but a missile did! It’s the only projectile that could have caused the damage indicated by photographs taken after the false flag event. There may also have been explosives that discharged upon impact to make sure that the documents stored in that part of the Pentagon were completely destroyed. You want names and motivations? Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOq-LbQ4erM

     Reply

     1. Johnny, I don’t agree that a missile is the only way to explain the damage. But I do agree that a 757 did not hit the building. Can I add you to our No 757 list?

        Reply

144. What we were told that happened that day-September the Eleventh 2001 (as Boy George always said)…was a LIE!….Bush and Cheney and Rumsfield and Israel and probably Larry Silverstein, Mayor Rudy Juliani and many more were in on it!….And you can bet George Hubert Walker Bush had a hand in it with several of his Sons!….All to Steal wealth and power and to persuade the American Sheeple into surrendering their Rights and Freedoms All for Safety and protection from “Terrorism” ..& The Boogieman Osama Bin Laden and allow complete surveillance and nose up our ** and Con Troll by Big Brother!….WE Are Either With the Government and The LIE..or We Are with the Terrorists!….Welcome to The New World Order!

     Reply

     1. How did George view the first crash on a TV monitor at Booker elementary school on his way into the second grade classroom, when that video was not shown on television until the next day? Please George come up with a better lie to cover that lie I know you are full of lies.

        Reply

145. Please add my name – Kevin Gerhart
     kev61az2128@gmail.com
     Prescott, Arizona

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Kevin!

        Reply

146. “There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil for every one cutting at the root”
     Henry David Thoreau
     I think there has been some inflations since HDT’s time; perhaps a million to one now?
     Keep digging and cutting deep!

     Reply

147. It’s not as if people haven’t seen the aftermath of plane crashes before.
     Same story with WTC7: Many of us have seen quite a number of controlled demolitions before – after all, they’re usually rather exciting and impressive to watch.
     That’s why we know that this was one of them.
     Lie about that, and your credibility for all the other events of that day disappears like the concrete floors in WTCs 1 and 2.
     We no longer have a reason to trust you or believe your stories.

     Reply

     1. Please add me to the list.
        I’m a performing and teaching classical musician.

        Reply

        1. Wardropper, what is your proper name? And can I put a city next to your name on the list? Thanks.

           Reply

148. Writer – San Francisco, California

     Please put me on the list.

     Reply

     1. Thank you, Steven!

        Reply

149. please add my name to your list

     Eric Rehnke, Mesa, Arizona

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Eric!

        Reply

150. Add me too list. I dont see how to add self.

     Reply

     1. Got you, Quinton! Thanks!

        Reply

151. Please add me to th list.

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Larry! Can we add a city and state (or country if outside the U.S.)?

        Reply

152. Please add me to this list, Craig. Thanks.

     Toronto, Ontario

     Reply

     1. Got you, Gunar! Thanks!

        Reply

153. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB

     Reply

154. 911 was a weapon of mass distraction and destruction!

     Kathryn R. Titus Athens Georgia USA

     Reply

     1. Thanks, Kathryn!

        Reply

155. I’m with you No Plan hit the pentagon

     Reply

     1. Great, I’ll add you. Can I put a city and country with your name?

        Reply

156. What are the chances of getting this site onto Facebook in time for the 20th anniversary. The only way I heard of this site was on Facebook’s 911 truth Movement when David Chandler was criticizing CIT’s findings. 9/11 Truth Movement has so many trolls it appears more like an anti-truth site. Facebook claims to have 2.8 billion viewers. Truthandshadows should be on it as long as it lasts.

     Reply